- Everhour vs Harvest: which time tracker wins, and what else is worth considering?
- Quick comparison: Everhour vs Harvest vs actiTIME
- What is Everhour?
- What is Harvest?
- What is actiTIME?
- Project management integrations
- Time tracking
- Budgets and project finances
- Invoicing and billing
- Leave and team capacity
- Pricing comparison
- Pros and cons
- Best Everhour alternatives
- Who should use each tool?
- The bottom line
- Resources
Everhour vs Harvest: which time tracker wins, and what else is worth considering?
Short answer: Everhour and Harvest both track time and report on projects, but they’re built around different workflows. Everhour lives inside your project management tools (Asana, Jira, Trello, Linear, ClickUp) and tracks time without switching context. Harvest is a standalone tracker with a built-in invoicing and billing flow. If you need something that goes deeper on project financials without a project management dependency, actiTIME is the strongest Everhour alternative for that use case.
Choose Everhour if: your team already uses Asana, Jira, Trello, or similar tools and you want time tracking to live inside those tools rather than alongside them. Everhour’s native integrations let you start and stop timers without leaving your task board. The 5-seat minimum on the paid tier is a real constraint for small teams.
Choose Harvest if: you need a standalone tracker that also handles invoicing. Harvest’s free version covers one seat and two projects, making it accessible for freelancers. Paid tiers are $9 and $14 per seat, and the integration with Stripe, QuickBooks, and Xero makes billing workflows smooth.
Quick comparison: Everhour vs Harvest vs actiTIME
| Feature | Everhour | Harvest | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free version | Yes (up to 5 users, limited) | Yes (1 seat, 2 projects) | Yes (up to 3 users) |
| Native PM integrations | Yes | Limited (Asana, Basecamp) | Zapier-based |
| Standalone timer | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Invoicing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Project budgets | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Billing rates | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Project profitability | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Leave & overtime | Limited | No | Yes |
| Timesheet approvals | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | No | No | Yes |
| Minimum seat requirement | 5 seats (paid) | None | None |
What is Everhour?
Everhour is a time tracking tool built to work inside project management apps rather than as a standalone product. Its integrations with Asana, Jira, Trello, Linear, ClickUp, Basecamp, GitHub, and Front are native, meaning timers appear directly inside those tools’ interfaces. You don’t open a separate app to log time. Everhour also handles budgets, billing rates, invoicing, and basic reporting.
The pricing structure has an important catch: the paid Team tier requires a minimum of five seats at $8.50 per user per month (annual). A three-person team still pays for five seats, making the effective cost $42.50 per month rather than $25.50. The free version supports up to five users with limited features. There’s also a Custom tier for teams of 50 or more with volume discounts.
What is Harvest?
Harvest is a time tracking and invoicing tool launched in 2006 and used by freelancers, consultants, and small agencies. Its interface centers on tracking billable hours and turning them into invoices. The free version limits you to one seat and two active projects, which covers freelancers testing the tool. Teams ($9/seat/month) unlocks unlimited seats, team reports, and QuickBooks, Xero, and Stripe integrations. Enterprise ($14/seat/month) adds profitability reporting, timesheet approvals, and SSO.
Harvest does not embed into project management tools the way Everhour does. It works alongside them via integrations rather than inside them.
What is actiTIME?
actiTIME is project time tracking software that gives teams financial visibility into their work. Where Everhour and Harvest focus on time capture and basic billing, actiTIME connects those hours to cost of work, project profitability, overtime, and leave. actiTIME does not embed in project management tools but works as a standalone hub for time and project data. Three delivery options: free for up to three users, online from $5 per user per month, and self-hosted with a one-time $120 per user payment.
See also: actiTIME vs Harvest: Side-by-Side Comparison
Project management integrations
| Integration | Everhour | Harvest | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asana | Native (timer in UI) | Yes (via integration) | Via Zapier |
| Jira | Native | No | Via Zapier |
| Trello | Native | No | Via Zapier |
| ClickUp | Native | No | Via Zapier |
| Linear | Native | No | No |
| Basecamp | Native | Yes | Via Zapier |
| QuickBooks | Yes | Yes (Teams+) | Yes |
| GitHub | Native | No | No |
Winner: Everhour, for teams already inside Asana, Jira, or similar. If embedding the timer in your task board matters, Everhour has no real competition here. For teams that don’t live in a PM tool, this advantage disappears.
Time tracking
| Feature | Everhour | Harvest | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Browser extension timer | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop app | No | Yes (Mac, Windows) | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes (iOS, Android) | Yes (iOS, Android) | Yes (iOS, Android) |
| Manual time entry | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Timesheet view | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Offline tracking | Limited | Yes | Yes |
Winner: a draw for most teams. Harvest has a more complete desktop app. Everhour wins if you’re working inside a supported PM tool.
Budgets and project finances
| Feature | Everhour | Harvest | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project budgets (hours) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Project budgets (cost) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Billing rates | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Budget alerts | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Project profitability | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Fixed-fee project tracking | Yes | No | Yes |
| Cost of work reports | Yes (limited) | No | Yes |
Winner: actiTIME for depth of financial reporting. Harvest requires Enterprise ($14/seat) for profitability. Everhour has it on the Team tier. actiTIME gives you full financial visibility from its base paid option.
Invoicing and billing
| Feature | Everhour | Harvest | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invoice creation | Yes (Team) | Yes | Yes |
| Expense tracking | No | Yes | Yes |
| Stripe integration | No | Yes | No |
| QuickBooks sync | Yes | Yes (Teams+) | Yes |
| Xero integration | No | Yes (Teams+) | No |
Winner for invoicing: Harvest. The Stripe + QuickBooks + Xero combination is the cleanest billing workflow in this comparison.
Leave and team capacity
| Feature | Everhour | Harvest | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leave tracking | Limited (time off requests) | No | Yes |
| Overtime registration | No | No | Yes |
| Timesheet approvals | Yes | Yes (Enterprise) | Yes |
| Team capacity view | Yes | No | Yes |
Winner: actiTIME for leave and overtime. Harvest doesn’t cover this at all. Everhour has basic time-off features but no overtime.
Pricing comparison
Everhour pricing
| Tier | Price | Key features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (up to 5 users, limited) | Basic time tracking, reports, limited integrations |
| Team | $8.50/user/month (annual, min 5 seats) | All features: budgets, billing, invoicing, SSO, integrations |
| Custom | Contact sales (50+ seats) | Volume discounts, dedicated support, priority onboarding |
Important: the 5-seat minimum means a 3-person team pays for 5 seats ($42.50/month) instead of the 3 they use ($25.50/month).
See also: Everhour Review 2026: Full Feature & Pricing Breakdown
Harvest pricing
| Tier | Price | Key features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (1 seat, 2 projects) | Time tracking, invoicing, expenses |
| Teams | $9/seat/month | Unlimited seats, QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe, team reports |
| Enterprise | $14/seat/month | Profitability, timesheet approvals, SSO, activity log |
See also: Harvest Pricing Review 2026: Plans, Costs & actiTIME Comparison
actiTIME pricing
| Option | Price | Key features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (up to 3 users) | Time tracking, projects, reports, permanent |
| Online | From $5/user/month or $1,500/month (unlimited users) | All features, leave & overtime, API, QuickBooks |
| Self-hosted | $120/user, one-time | Full features, own server, no ongoing fees |
Cost comparison for a 5-person team (annual billing)
| Tool | Monthly cost | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|
| Everhour Team (5 seats, min) | $42.50/month | $510/year |
| Harvest Teams | $45/month | $540/year |
| Harvest Enterprise | $70/month | $840/year |
| actiTIME Online | $25/month | $300/year |
Pros and cons
Everhour
- Native timer integration inside Asana, Jira, Trello, ClickUp, Linear, GitHub
- Full budget and billing features on a single paid tier
- No feature tiers to navigate
- 5-seat minimum makes it expensive for teams under 5
- No desktop app
- Depends on PM tool integrations for best experience
- Limited leave and overtime tracking
Harvest
- Best invoicing workflow in this comparison
- Stripe + QuickBooks + Xero integrations
- Generous free version for solo users
- Profitability only on Enterprise tier
- No native PM tool integrations (Asana via Harvest-native, others limited)
- No leave or overtime tracking
actiTIME
- Project budgets, billing rates, profitability tracking included
- Leave and overtime built in
- Self-hosted option with one-time payment
- Permanent free version for up to 3 users
- No PM tool native integrations
Best Everhour alternatives
If Everhour’s 5-seat minimum, PM tool dependency, or pricing model don’t work for your team, these are the alternatives worth considering:
Harvest: Better if you need standalone time tracking with native invoicing. No seat minimums, and the free version is genuinely useful for solo work.
actiTIME: Better if you need project profitability, billing rates, and leave tracking without a 5-seat minimum. Free for up to 3 users, from $5 per user per month after that.
TimeCamp: Better if you want automatic time tracking from app and website usage. Free version with unlimited users.
Clockify: Better if you want a free tier with more room. Up to 5 users free. Paid features start at $3.99 per user per month.
Who should use each tool?
Everhour: Teams with 5 or more people who live in Asana, Jira, Trello, or ClickUp and want time tracking to happen inside those tools. The PM integration is its strongest card.
Harvest: Freelancers and small client-service teams who need a clean billing workflow. The free version suits solo operators. Paid tiers cover invoicing and basic project tracking.
actiTIME: Project teams that need financial visibility: cost of work, billing rates, project profitability, leave, and overtime. Works well for agencies, consultancies, and services businesses billing by the hour.
The bottom line
Everhour wins when your team already runs in Asana, Jira, or Trello and wants the timer to live inside those tools. Harvest wins when invoicing is the priority. Neither goes deep on project profitability and leave tracking at an entry price. actiTIME covers that gap.
Resources
Everhour pricing (verified June 2026): everhour.com/pricing
Harvest pricing (verified June 2026): getharvest.com/pricing
actiTIME pricing (verified June 2026): actitime.com/pricing
