- TimeCamp vs Hubstaff: which one is right for your team?
- Quick comparison: TimeCamp vs Hubstaff vs actiTIME
- What is TimeCamp?
- What is Hubstaff?
- What is actiTIME?
- Time tracking and capture
- Workforce monitoring
- Project budgets and finances
- Payroll and HR
- Pricing comparison
- Who should use each tool?
- The bottom line
- Resources
TimeCamp vs Hubstaff: which one is right for your team?
Short answer: TimeCamp and Hubstaff overlap on time tracking but target different problems. Hubstaff is built for remote and field team management, adding GPS tracking, screenshots, payroll, and workforce monitoring on top of its timer. TimeCamp focuses on automatic time capture from computer activity and brings in attendance and leave management at much lower price points. actiTIME sits alongside both as a project-financial alternative for teams that want time tied to project costs and profitability without the monitoring layer.
Choose Hubstaff if: you manage remote workers or field teams and need to know who’s working, from where, and on what. Hubstaff’s GPS tracking, screenshot capture, activity monitoring, and payroll integrations are its main reasons to exist. These features start appearing on the Grow and Team tiers ($7.50 and $10 per seat per month, annual).
Choose TimeCamp if: you want automatic tracking from computer activity without the monitoring overhead of screenshots and GPS. TimeCamp’s free tier supports unlimited users with auto-tracking. Paid plans from $3.99 add attendance, leave, invoicing, and budgets at prices well below Hubstaff’s equivalent features.
Quick comparison: TimeCamp vs Hubstaff vs actiTIME
| Feature | TimeCamp | Hubstaff | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free version | Yes | No (14-day trial) | Yes (up to 3 users) |
| Auto app/website tracking | Yes | Yes | No |
| GPS tracking | Yes | Yes | No |
| Screenshots | No | Yes | No |
| Payroll processing | No | Yes | No |
| Invoicing | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Project budgets | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Billing rates | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Project profitability | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Attendance / leave | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Overtime tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Timesheet approvals | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | No | Yes |
What is TimeCamp?
TimeCamp is a time tracking tool with automatic capture at its core. It runs in the background and tracks which apps and websites you use, then lets you categorize and assign those activities to projects. The free version supports unlimited users and includes the AI-powered auto tracker with starter credits. Paid tiers from $3.99 per user per month (annual) add attendance tracking, leave management, invoicing, budgets, and billing rates.
TimeCamp does not take screenshots or track GPS location for desktop users. The monitoring it does is passive (app and website logging) rather than active surveillance. This is a meaningful difference for teams where employee trust and privacy matter.
What is Hubstaff?
Hubstaff is a workforce management platform that tracks time and monitors how work is done. It captures screenshots at configurable intervals, logs GPS location for mobile workers, monitors app and URL usage, and processes payroll through integrations. Hubstaff has a 2-seat minimum on all plans and no permanent free tier. Plans run from $4.99 per seat per month (Starter, annual) to $25 per seat per month (Enterprise). Features like screenshots and payroll require the Team tier at $10 per seat per month.
Hubstaff’s monitoring capabilities are its main differentiator. Teams choose it specifically because they need accountability data on remote or field workers, not just time totals.
What is actiTIME?
actiTIME is project time tracking software that connects hours to project financials. It covers project budgets, billing rates by work type, cost of work, profitability, leave, and overtime in a single product with no feature tiers. No screenshots, no GPS, no activity monitoring. Three delivery options: free for up to 3 users, online from $5 per user per month, and self-hosted for $120 per user one-time.
See also: actiTIME vs Hubstaff 2026: Full Comparison | actiTIME vs TimeCamp: 2026 In-Depth Comparison
Time tracking and capture
| Feature | TimeCamp | Hubstaff | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manual timer | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic app/website tracking | Yes | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes (iOS, Android) | Yes (iOS, Android) | Yes (iOS, Android) |
| Browser extension | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Offline tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Winner: a draw for basic tracking. TimeCamp’s auto-tracking is available from the free tier. Hubstaff’s app tracking requires Team ($10). For pure time capture, TimeCamp delivers more without a paid plan.
Workforce monitoring
| Feature | TimeCamp | Hubstaff | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screenshots | No | Yes | No |
| Activity levels (keyboard/mouse) | No | Yes | No |
| GPS location tracking | Yes (mobile) | Yes | No |
| Field worker clock-in/out | No | Yes | No |
| App and URL logs | Yes | Yes | No |
Winner: Hubstaff, for teams that need active monitoring. TimeCamp tracks app usage passively but has no screenshots or activity levels. actiTIME has no monitoring features at all.
Project budgets and finances
| Feature | TimeCamp | Hubstaff | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project budgets (hours) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Project budgets (cost) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Billing rates | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Fixed-fee projects | Yes | No | Yes |
| Project profitability | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cost of work reports | No | Limited | Yes |
Winner: actiTIME for financial depth. Both TimeCamp and Hubstaff offer budgets and billing rates, but require higher tiers to unlock them. actiTIME includes the full financial picture from $5 per user per month.
Payroll and HR
| Feature | TimeCamp | Hubstaff | actiTIME |
|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll processing | No | Yes | No |
| Attendance tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Leave / time-off management | Yes (Starter+) | Yes | Yes |
| Overtime tracking | Yes (Ultimate) | Yes | Yes |
| Timesheet approvals | Yes (Ultimate) | Yes | Yes |
Winner: Hubstaff for payroll. TimeCamp and actiTIME both cover attendance, leave, and overtime, but neither processes payroll. If payroll is the deciding factor, Hubstaff (Team+) is the only option here.
Pricing comparison
TimeCamp pricing
| Tier | Price | Key features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (unlimited users) | Auto tracking, projects, reports, AI tracker |
| Starter | $3.99/user/month (annual) / $5.49 monthly | Attendance, leave, invoicing, overtime |
| Premium | $6.99/user/month (annual) / $9.99 monthly | Budgets, estimates, app/website tracking depth |
| Ultimate | $9.99/user/month (annual) / $13.99 monthly | Billing rates, profitability, SSO, approvals |
| Enterprise | Custom (50+ users) | Self-hosted, SLA, custom integrations |
See also: TimeCamp Pricing Review 2026
Hubstaff pricing (annual billing)
| Tier | Price | Key features |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $4.99/seat/month (min 2 seats) | Time tracking, invoicing, basic reports |
| Grow | $7.50/seat/month | GPS, budgets, project costs, activity levels |
| Team | $10/seat/month | Screenshots, payroll, timesheet approvals, expenses |
| Enterprise | $25/seat/month | SSO, dedicated support, custom onboarding |
Monthly billing: Starter $7, Grow $9, Team $12, Enterprise $25.
See also: Hubstaff Pricing 2026: Plans, True Costs & Hidden Fees
actiTIME pricing
| Option | Price | Key features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (up to 3 users) | Time tracking, projects, reports, permanent |
| Online | From $5/user/month or $1,250/month (200+ users) | All features, leave & overtime, API, QuickBooks |
| Self-hosted | $120/user, one-time | Full features, own infrastructure, no ongoing fees |
Cost comparison for 10 users (annual billing)
| Tool & tier | Monthly cost | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|
| TimeCamp Free | $0 | $0 |
| TimeCamp Starter | $39.90/month | $478.80/year |
| TimeCamp Ultimate | $99.90/month | $1,198.80/year |
| Hubstaff Starter | $49.90/month | $598.80/year |
| Hubstaff Team | $100/month | $1,200/year |
| actiTIME Online | $50/month | $600/year |
Who should use each tool?
TimeCamp: Teams that want passive time capture without the overhead of screenshot monitoring. Good for companies with flexible work styles where logging time is a friction point. The free tier with unlimited users is the best entry point in this comparison.
Hubstaff: Remote-first companies and field service businesses that need accountability data alongside time tracking. GPS, screenshots, and payroll make Hubstaff a workforce management platform, not just a time tracker.
actiTIME: Project-based teams that want to understand the financial side of their work. If your questions are about project profitability, billing accuracy, and cost of work rather than employee activity monitoring, actiTIME answers them without the monitoring layer.
The bottom line
TimeCamp and Hubstaff look similar on the surface but serve different purposes. TimeCamp is a passive time capture tool with good attendance features at low cost. Hubstaff is an active monitoring platform for remote and field teams. If neither quite fits, try actiTIME — it covers the project financial side without the monitoring overhead.
Resources
- TimeCamp pricing (verified June 2026): timecamp.com/pricing
- Hubstaff pricing (verified June 2026): hubstaff.com/pricing
- actiTIME pricing (verified June 2026): actitime.com/pricing
